I wanted Bark to work.
I really did.
I’ve been using and testing Bark for more than a year. I ran it the way a lot of iPhone families do. My son’s iPhone connected to Bark via my Windows PC. We didn’t use Bark for location tracking. We use Life360 and like that. We didn’t use Bark for parental controls either. We set that up with Apple Family.
Bark was meant to do one job for us. Messaging and online activity risk alerts.
That’s it.
And it failed at that job.
Problem one: Bark would not connect to my son’s iPhone
This was the deal breaker.
Ninety nine percent of the time, Bark would not connect to my son’s iPhone. Even when I manually tried to force a scan. Even when I followed their setup steps. Even after months of trying.
I spent many frustrating hours on this. Restarting. Reconnecting. Re authorising. Reading support articles. Trying again.
Most attempts ended the same way. Nothing happened.
No scan. No data. No alerts.
Which means no protection.
What made it worse was the experience on my son’s phone. When Bark did try to connect, he would get deluged with pop ups asking for permission. Not one prompt. Dozens. Over and over. It was intrusive, confusing, and frustrating for him. And after all of that, it still usually didn’t work.
If a safety product can’t reliably connect to the device it’s meant to monitor, it doesn’t work. Full stop.
Problem two: the alerts were mostly incorrect or meaningless
On the rare occasions Bark did manage to scan, the alerts were bad.
Not just occasionally wrong. Consistently wrong.
Most of the alerts were either meaningless or incorrect. Playful messages flagged as serious. Normal kid language pulled out of context. Single phrases highlighted with no sense of what came before or after.
The result was predictable. I had to do all the work anyway.
Instead of being alerted to real problems, I was sifting through hundreds of false alerts trying to work out what mattered. Over time, this creates alert fatigue. You stop trusting the system. You start ignoring notifications.
A safety product that trains parents to ignore alerts is actively unsafe.
Problem three: Bark’s monitoring model ignores how kids actually communicate
This is the deeper issue, and it explains why the alerts felt so poor.
Bark appears to analyse risk at the level of individual messages. Single lines. Isolated phrases. Scored in isolation.
That approach will never work for understanding a child’s wellbeing online.
Kids don’t communicate in single messages. They communicate in patterns. Tone. Escalation. Repetition. Group dynamics. A shift over days or weeks.
Bullying shows up as repetition and pile ons. Grooming shows up as gradual pressure and secrecy. Emotional distress shows up across time, not in one sentence.
You can’t judge any of that from one message at a time.
So the hard work gets pushed back onto parents. The exact people who bought the product because they are already stretched.
This is one of the biggest reasons I built Joey differently. You need to understand messages holistically and contextually, not as a scatter of isolated “risk pings.”
Problem four: the app coverage was not real for us on iPhone
Bark markets itself as monitoring lots of apps. That list creates an expectation.
In practice, most of the apps I wanted to use simply did not work on iPhone. Some couldn’t be connected at all. Others required repeated re authorisation. Others failed silently.
It was constant “try again” energy.
I will include screenshots in this article showing the long list of apps I attempted to connect and the screens Bark showed me instead.
Problem five: support didn’t resolve the core issues
When you’re dealing with your child’s safety, support quality matters.
My experience with Bark support was generic and unhelpful. I was pointed back to the same setup steps. The same articles. The same advice to retry, re authorise, and trust the computer again.
There was no meaningful path to resolution for the core problem. The product not connecting reliably.
Over time, Bark felt like a big company that had stopped pushing hard on making iPhone monitoring actually work.
My honest takeaway after a year of testing
Bark sounds good in theory. The marketing promise is exactly what parents want to hear.
In practice, it failed where it mattered most for our family.
It did not reliably connect to my son’s iPhone.
Its alerts were noisy and low quality.
Its monitoring model ignores how kids actually communicate.
Its app coverage was overstated for iPhone families.
And when things broke, support didn’t bridge the gap.
Most importantly, it did not earn my trust.
If you’re an iPhone parent considering Bark, my advice is simple. Test it hard. Don’t assume it’s working just because the dashboard looks quiet. And ask yourself one honest question.
Is this actually helping me protect my child, or is it just keeping me busy.
Next up: {{recommendedNext from catalog}}
